So to boil it down stop acting like a Null Sec lobby group and More like representatives of ALL players.

Did they sign off on it all that was said was that the current ACTIVE CSM members did, besides the authors who knows what that means.

As I have said to you before I personally would like to see Null fixed but not at the expense of Hi-sec and after the POS's and the corporate management system was fixed. Which is exactly what giving Hi-sec minerals to Null will do.

Nor am I a CSM member, it is my interests I represent, not the player bases as a whole, just as it is in your best interests to represent your own, which you do frequently.

Yes because what is the CSMs biggest problem after all the years of NUll sec dominance and control?

I know where Two step is from where are the others from?

As to Pming the members would it not have been easier if they had said these members agreed with this rather than the vague active statement? or if you believe so strongly that the Hi-sec candidates agreed to this why don't you go get quotes off them.

Care to explain why or you just prefer larger bounties that will just again get nerfed as soon as the inflation rate goes up

No tech is not a unique resource it is a badly implemented broken mechanic.

But in saying that if the Alliance that held those moons gave all the profits of them to its members, the members would not have such a crappy risk vs reward. They are not a resource for players unlike ring mining they are a welfare hand out to corps.

If moon mining did not need to be touched at all, then if you take the total income provided by Moon mining in Null and divide it by the number of Null sec players, subsequently their incomes are substantially higher.

Subsequently their risk vs. reward is more acceptable. You can not have it both ways complaining that the individual players are broke while some corporations are raking in trillions a year from moon mining.

It is a broken mechanic, corps and alliance funding should be from the bottom up, not the top down or you end up with a circumstance like this where some corporations are wasting money hand over fist while their members are on the forums bitching about Nulls risk vs reward.

And insults or no you are just worried about your low maintenance isk fountains.

Tech should not be nerfed it should be gone.

Yeah as people put up moon minng operations because they are high maintenance and loosing businesses.

No they are not huge fountains like tech but they still do not require much player interaction to gain reward.

Ring Mining, that was what that feature is for.

Actually as I have said in other threads, I personally think tech should be an NPC good until they do the POS revamp and the ring mining, as it is so out of balance to the rest of the game. Yes alchemy lowered its price but it is still distorting the whole of Null.

As I only skimmed over the document and the posts, I do apologize if I missed it.

I don't see any mention of bug fixing.